As the urban poor from New York and New Jersey discovered the clean streets of Allentown, and its moderately priced apartments, a steady influx of new residents arrived daily. These changes were not encouraged by the landlords. Nobody ever purchased a building hoping to replace their conscientious middle class occupants, with a poorer, more problematic tenant base. Various social agencies staked many of these newcomers to the first month rent and security deposits.
Ironically, more apartment inventory has been added recently, by creating "loft" apartments in former commercial buildings. The Urbanists think they can revitalize Hamilton Street with upper story housing. While the proponents mistakenly think that they will attract a middle class demographic, they are in fact just adding to the total inventory and thus the problem. Beside the urbanists, advocates for low income housing still demand more units. In reality, it's apparent we have an abundance of low income housing. Recently, there has been a trend to built new, center city single housing; attempting to attract a middle class with disposable income to bolster Hamilton Street. Neighborhood parking lots have been sacrificed for this concept.* In fact, we are just building tomorrow's rental houses. Allentown, unlike larger cities, is a horizontal community. There is no reason, geographic or otherwise, which compels the middle class to move to center city.
Allentown would currently be better served with a moratorium on new housing of all sorts in center city. Considering that over 7000 units exist, owned by 5000 different owners, deconversion hopes are unrealistic. Strict enforcement of current zoning standards, concerning square footage, parking, etc. would suffice in reasonably curtailing additional living units. By limiting supply, demand can improve the quality of life for everybody.
*This post was written in 2009, and the new housing refers to the then new townhouses at 8th and Walnut, and others planned for more Parking Authority lots. Those "new" townhouses have since been sold at auction for 50 cents on the dollar, and are in fact now rentals.
ADDENDUM MARCH 14,2025; Reilly's scattered NIZ financed Strata apartments now approach over 1500 units. While intended for young urban office workers, that demographic apparently still prefers the safety of suburban living. While many Strata units remain dark at night, suburban units approach full occupany. Thanks to taxpayer generosity through the NIZ, Reilly can afford to have them empty, instead of occupied problematically. However, eventually the subsidiary will end, and the problems will begin.
Allentown would currently be better served with a moratorium on new housing of all sorts in center city. Considering that over 7000 units exist, owned by 5000 different owners, deconversion hopes are unrealistic. Strict enforcement of current zoning standards, concerning square footage, parking, etc. would suffice in reasonably curtailing additional living units. By limiting supply, demand can improve the quality of life for everybody.
*This post was written in 2009, and the new housing refers to the then new townhouses at 8th and Walnut, and others planned for more Parking Authority lots. Those "new" townhouses have since been sold at auction for 50 cents on the dollar, and are in fact now rentals.
ADDENDUM MARCH 14,2025; Reilly's scattered NIZ financed Strata apartments now approach over 1500 units. While intended for young urban office workers, that demographic apparently still prefers the safety of suburban living. While many Strata units remain dark at night, suburban units approach full occupany. Thanks to taxpayer generosity through the NIZ, Reilly can afford to have them empty, instead of occupied problematically. However, eventually the subsidiary will end, and the problems will begin.
photograph of 10th and Chew Streets, 1948
I see the future: Camden on the Lehigh.
ReplyDeleteAll cities need to start with having a population with an income that can be earned in the city. Stadiums and other ideas to attract weekend visitors will not ever revitalize a city.
ReplyDeleteThe real economy of Allentown, and I am no expert for sure, lies with Spanish speaking community, lots of entrepreneurs hoping to increase their standard of living and becoming prosperous in the community.
The best idea would be to encourage entrepreneurship with relaxing regulations to allow for small enterprises to function in residential areas, much like the forgotten path to prosperity of the past.
The spanish community needs to take control of the local government and forget about race baiting and woke politics and focus on increasing the opportunity and prosperity of their community.
Ray@6:56: I agree that the future of center city mostly rests with the Hispanic community. However, I would hope that subsidy programs do not play a major role. All the subsidized businesses put on Hamilton Street years ago failed. The dress up of 7th St., and now upper Hamilton Street, is on our dime. We need real entrepreneurs, not Community Action make believes.
ReplyDeleteThe irony is that North 7th street, from Hamilton to Tilghman, was always designed to be a commercial buisness district, even in the 1800s.
DeleteThis is why North 7th street was a wide, 3 lane street, just like Hamilton is. No other north-south street in Old Allentown, from the Lehigh River to 17th is 3 lanes wide.
Mike they all work nights that's why the lights are out.
ReplyDeleteanon@7:24: and they don't eat, that's why the Marketplace on the Arts Walk can't keep businesses.
ReplyDeleteI'm convinced he sells them at a massive profit to the public for use as low/moderate income housing.
ReplyDeleteYes, while we continue to wait years for a thorough financial analysis of the success/failure of the ‘one of a kind’ Allentown Neighborhood Zone.
DeleteYou, and I, folks, together with all other Pennsylvania taxpayers are paying dearly for this municipal hornswaggle.
What we deserve is a local version of DOGE to expose the truth about this obvious failure and misuse of our dollars.
Interesting point. Personally, I'm very concerned that Trump will be emulated by some candidates for state, county and local office, creating all sorts of havoc with competent, hard working public employees and disruption of important services provided at these levels of government. I've recently seen a candidate for New Jersey Governor using the slogan "Make New Jersey Affordable Again"
DeleteIf any waste, fraud, and abuse of public tax dollars locally is identified it MUST be eliminated. I don’t care about any temporary havoc that might occur. Cleaning out any ‘closet’ not only takes work, ends up with junk on the floor, but soon ends up with clean and more efficient living space.
DeleteWe are constantly told how many will suffer through corporate, government downsizing. But, specifically, who and how are they suffering? And are such changing conditions not ever to be remedied by a new approach?
anons@8:37, 10:03, 11:40: I will not be hosting any more DOGE, MAGA pro or con comments on this post about converted row houses in Allentown.
DeleteI agree with your 2009 assessment of the problem. I never understood why the “new” downtown was only for renters. Now I understand that it was about depreciation and not really about building a stable neighborhood. Outside of a hockey game I have no reason to go downtown. The restaurants have become sports bars, nothing unique there. Billy’s, which kept people coming and going most of the day, is a long-ago memory. I see many of these buildings as future public housing. As you pointed out, rentals don’t attract the middle class. The middle class rents when they are on their way to something else. Like young folks before they invest in a family home, or seniors who have divested from the family homes. Downtown was planned for neither of these groups. I don’t think Allentown’s loft conversion is doing any good either. It’s much like the old SRO (single room occupancy) hotels and flophouses.
ReplyDeleteThe conversion of single-family homes to multi-family rentals happened in earlier decades, yes. When my parents were married in the early 1950s, they rented a second-floor apartment on Franklin Street near Hotel Trailor. It was a conversion as we were the only apartment home on that block. After I came around, we moved to the larger first-floor apartment. I still remember the third floor apartment, the origional attic, being a one-bedroom loft apartment.
ReplyDeleteThe rest of the homes, being row homes, were all single-family homes.
They still are, as far as I know, even to this day.
Brent - The single-family homes are being allowed to be converted by the current administration. It's happening across the city.
ReplyDeleteanon@10:54: I don't know of a property which has been "converted" in years. Please supply one such address.
DeleteSuch projects are listed weekly in the Morning Call government announcements of the Classified Section. I don’t know how many of those plans get rejected, however.
DeleteWhen the rental license was adopted, the paper sent out stated, (I may be paraphrasing here,) that "IF you fail to register your rental property NOW, you will NEVER be permitted to do so in the future" or something very close to that... yet another lie by our once great city...
DeleteBTW, single homes may be rented in their entirety... as the old folks die and their lifetime homes are sold, they become rentals.
Deleteanon@10:54: I could find no private resident conversion requests in today's legal notices, involving adding kitchens and bathroom. BUT, I have been informed on good source, that large homes are renting out rooms, and that those rentals are not unknown by the city.
DeleteHow is Audit The NIZ going?
ReplyDeleteanon@12:04: I believe that Jarrett Coleman's sincere efforts have been stalled, and Nick Miller's compromised NIZ friendly alternative may be progressing. Coleman's office is welcome to comment here on the matter.
DeleteNIZ audit conducted by Commonwealth Legislative Budget and Finance Committee set for release March 24th.
DeleteWhile the first part of this article is factual and true; it devolves into a bias of, essentially, an inability to imagine people actively wanting to live in urban environments. The truth is that a vast majority of those strata units are fully occupied by a split demographic. A sizable majority representing young formerly suburban white collar workers, and the other representing empty-nesting older folks who miss urban living and are looking for the high-end amenities of these new units. Combined, these groups are the reason why those units have a 90+% occupancy rate. Informed commentary can only truly be informed when based on factual information.
ReplyDeleteanon@12:23: Those poor older folk empty nesters...There are no amenities downtown, they even have to get their car out of the deck to go buy groceries in suburbia. There is a shortage of apartments in suburbia, which would be the only reason for improved occupancy downtown.
DeleteMy biggest gripe about multi-units in central Allentown has to do with assessment and taxes. A random example: a single family dwelling in the 900 block of S. 8th St. pays $3,130 in property taxes. The property next door, a 2 unit owned by a suburban speculator on the same lot size, pays $3,025. Since the multi-unit generates double the demand for County, City and ASD services, I think the assessment should be higher, not lower. You see this all over center city, multi-units being assessed the same or only slightly higher than nearby owner-occupied single family homes on similar lot sizes. This is why I support a per unit Educational Impact Fee, where every dwelling unit is assessed an individual fee to fund ASD. A single family dwelling would pay 1 fee and a 5 unit would pay 5 fees. This would be accompanied by a reduction of the property tax for all properties. In a district where as many as 75% of the students come from rental units, it seems like a fair and reasonable way to reduce the tax burden on owner-occupied property owners.
ReplyDeleteYou missed one point... multi units pay multiple garbage fees... now $605.
Deleteanon@12:37 also missed, the per unit city license fee each year. Taxes are mostly based on square footage of the property, which doesn't change with the breakup into apartments. His strongest point is the potential increased burden on the school system. A big issue, as I mention @1:33, is the city is turning a blind eye to single houses renting out rooms. In such situations, there is no extra money to the city, such as separate garbage fees, but more kids in the schools. I suppose this is the Tuerk administration trying to ease the housing shortage in the city.
Delete12:37 repeats exactly what I referred to here in my yesterday post. Multi-family rental units DO NOT pay an appropriate amount of real estate taxes to cover the costs of city services demands they place, including school taxes. I know the reason, the tax formula is based primarily on the County square footage standard, and not the reality of multi-family living in the same square footage.
DeleteFor example, one side of an older half-double houses an elderly single adult. The other side of the same building is now converted to accommodate a younger, 2-family housing unit with 4-5 school age kids. Why this has not been changed over the years is a mystery.
Here's an idea... only charge school tax to those folks with kids in school. I'm sure they could calculate a fair fee per student. Also solves the school tax issue for us old retired folks on fixed incomes!!! What a concept... groundbreaking!!!
Deleteanon@8:02: In Allentown most of the student parents are tenants. But, more so, schemes to reduce school taxes have never succeeded. Forty five years ago that was the justification for the lottery. Twenty years ago that was the justification for the casinos. Although new large revenue streams were created, they never significantly reduced the property tax burden.
Delete8:02 here... Yes, Mr Mike, you are once again correct!!! Multiple money raising schemes to eliminate property taxes, help with drugs... ad nauseam... and every darn time the money evaporates into thin air!!! (But, great jobs for drones are created...) Just like selling the water works to cover pensions... STILL NOT ENOUGH!!! We are constantly sold a hill-a-bill-a-beans and it's ALWAYS a bunch of stinking bovine scat!!! SO, WHO needs accountability... gruberment, taxpayers or taxtakers???? Once upon a time it was possible to budget and life was good... now, the budget must change daily, or so it seems. When our checkbook balance is low, we curtail our spending... it's high time government did exactly the same!!!
DeleteAnon 3:30: I think the assessment policy hasn't been addressed due to liberal and/or incompetent political leadership at Allentown City. Any shrewd politician who wanted to maintain the very important aspect of owner-occupied single family dwellings in Allentown would have worked with the state legislature to make a special exception in Allentown to have a per unit education fee and reduced property tax. I think in 2025, the Mayor of Allentown should be looking for creative ways to attract new buyers for the City's single family dwellings.
DeleteYes, the conversions were "begged for" in the post war years, and now viewed as a pariah. I own one and refuse to rent it... much better living there by myself!!! IF you can garner "good" tenants, you have an apartment house, IF all you can find is idiots, you have a slum!!! I feel for the landlord(s) that state they'll accept anyone as tenants just so they can pay their mortgage... repairs are yet another problem. These "wonderful" tenants literally destroy their apartment and then move on to their next avenue of destruction. How many times must a screen door be replaced or a banister??? These are lifetime units, not every other month replacements... this is what contributes to poor housing... the destroyers!!!... of course, the property owner gets branded as a slumlord or uncaring!!! Sad, indeed. I had a late friend in the same situation... he stopped renting as they became vacant, and once the properties were vacant, he sold them all. Best move of his life, he said... turned a profit for years with nice tenants, and then a nightmare with later tenants.
ReplyDeleteI see the downtown as our future section 8 slums... you heard it here!!!