On November 5th I did not vote for the top of the ticket. Partisans on both sides said that I should at least vote for the one who I thought would do the least damage...I voted for no damage, for neither.
As Trump began naming his cabinet picks this week, it was apparent that loyalty, rather than expertise, was the criterion. His defenders referred to a President's need for both comfort and confidence in his picks. His pick of Matt Gaetz for Attorney General seems a stretch way too far.
Putting aside any previous accusations against the congressman, his legal background is probably too thin to even get a job with a top law firm. While Trump certainly won a mandate last week, the Senate must still consider their own integrity. It is apparent that Trump doesn't want their advice, but normally he would still need their consent, although he would like them to recess and bypass that check and balance feature of our government. For political cover and electability back home, a recess will probably also be the Senate's preference.
As a conservative independent, perhaps with the exception of Rubio, I do not understand how any Republican can take pride in any of the cabinet nominations.
Trump and Rubio in Allentown, Pa.
You cannot say it is the same old players, except for Rubio who we will see how he does. Glad to see Pompeo, who advocated for the assassination of Julian Assange and his family, is not on this list. Nor is John Bolton chief advocate of war everywhere.
ReplyDeleteDo we think that many of these agencies are bloated, partisan and have been breaking the law on a regular basis, then outsiders at the lead may be necessary.
Only time will tell, reform is needed, a good house-cleaning is the best start.