Apr 9, 2019

Wehr's Dam Conspiracy Against Voters


The South Whitehall Commissioners never expected the voters to approve the referendum in November of 2016 to retain Wehr's Dam, especially when they had associated it with a possible tax increase. They thought that they could accommodate the Wildlands Conservancy in demolishing the dam, with no political consequence to themselves.

In July of 2014, the Commissioners gave the Conservancy permission to conduct a study of the dam, which was intended to justify its demolition. The engineering firm for the Conservancy then claimed that the dam was leaking under itself, at one small spot. On February 13, 2015, the DEP wrote the township; "The Wildlands Conservancy has recently brought to our attention that there is some confusion relating to the current condition of the Wehr's Dam..." For the Commissioners to have granted the Wildlands Conservancy permission to interface with the state was improper. The dam is the historic property of the township residents, not an outside party.

A subsequent study of the dam by another engineering firm could not confirm the above referenced leak. It is now necessary for the Commissioners to put aside their agenda of accommodating the Wildlands Conservancy, and honor the results of the referendum. They must change their Park Master Plan, which still calls for the dam's demolition. They must now advocate for the dam with the state DEP, and correct any misconceptions about its condition.

Although its been over three years since the referendum, the township hasn't applied one dab of cement to the dam. On the contrary, last year they tried to breach the dam by having a contractor pull a large tree trunk over it. The township has not said or written one word about the dam since the referendum.  The Morning Call has never made one inquiry or written one word about the dam since the referendum. The dam sits in a state of benign neglect, waiting for the state to accommodate the Wildlands Conservancy and condemn it. Only this blog defends the dam, its magic, and the voters' wishes.

photograph by Gregg Obst

2 comments:

  1. The dam could be repaired, and it could be done reasonably, the dam will be there long after all those commissioners are gone. The dam is not a threat to anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For me to consider supporting any candidate for township commissioner, they must pledge to respect the voter's wishes concerning the dam.

    ReplyDelete

ANONYMOUS COMMENTS SELECTIVELY PUBLISHED. SIGNED COMMENTS GIVEN MORE LEEWAY.