tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-951782330457966647.post4187167487668432711..comments2024-03-28T13:56:44.627-04:00Comments on MOLOVINSKY ON ALLENTOWN: A Changing Confluencemichael molovinskyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12581039755319742687noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-951782330457966647.post-80441839881435082172013-06-17T22:46:48.934-04:002013-06-17T22:46:48.934-04:00Thanks MIke. I've asked around as well and no...Thanks MIke. I've asked around as well and no one seems to remember anything. Weird.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-951782330457966647.post-27959982281474782602013-06-17T10:31:59.521-04:002013-06-17T10:31:59.521-04:00@9:54, i don't know the official reason at th...@9:54, i don't know the official reason at this point. i asked a former engineer with the city, but he came on board after the decision was made. as i will post in the near future, my family owned some of the land adjoining the former channel. my guess is that the purpose was to reduce flooding, to protect the sewage plant. i will make some inquires.michael molovinskyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12581039755319742687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-951782330457966647.post-10458107326466250992013-06-17T09:54:02.099-04:002013-06-17T09:54:02.099-04:00Mike why did they fill in the channel? Was that B...Mike why did they fill in the channel? Was that Bracy or Bartholomew that authorized that idiocy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com